[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Vendor Branch Here

From: Ben Fritz <fritzophrenic_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:36:43 -0500

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Gavin Lambert <tsvn_at_mirality.co.nz> wrote:
> On 18/10/2013 02:45, Quoth Ben Fritz:
>> So how about this instead?
>>
>> 1. Check out /vendor/libname
>> 2. Right-click-drag the folder containing the newer code over the top
>> of /vendor/libname
>> 3. check for modifications
>> 4. do a "repair move" for any files that did get renamed (will this
>> work? maybe there is a manual "undo add" and such needed first)
>>
>> If step (4) doesn't work, then maybe the "repair move" feature needs a
>> little improvement for use cases like this.
>
> Is "repair move" an actual feature somewhere? I've never managed to
> find it if so. (I know how to do it manually of course.)
>

http://tortoisesvn.net/repairmoves.html

It does look like it will only work if one file is "missing" and the
other file is "unversioned". I wonder if this could be changed so that
you can also do it if one file is "deleted" and the other is "added",
if I understand correctly that's what the "vendor branch" command will
do.

------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=3066573

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2013-10-18 15:37:11 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.