[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Vendor Branch Here

From: Ben Fritz <fritzophrenic_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:36:43 -0500

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Gavin Lambert <tsvn_at_mirality.co.nz> wrote:
> On 18/10/2013 02:45, Quoth Ben Fritz:
>> So how about this instead?
>> 1. Check out /vendor/libname
>> 2. Right-click-drag the folder containing the newer code over the top
>> of /vendor/libname
>> 3. check for modifications
>> 4. do a "repair move" for any files that did get renamed (will this
>> work? maybe there is a manual "undo add" and such needed first)
>> If step (4) doesn't work, then maybe the "repair move" feature needs a
>> little improvement for use cases like this.
> Is "repair move" an actual feature somewhere? I've never managed to
> find it if so. (I know how to do it manually of course.)


It does look like it will only work if one file is "missing" and the
other file is "unversioned". I wonder if this could be changed so that
you can also do it if one file is "deleted" and the other is "added",
if I understand correctly that's what the "vendor branch" command will


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2013-10-18 15:37:11 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.