Re: not "the usual" missing icon overlay question

On 25.05.2010 08:43, Lorenz wrote:
> Stefan Küng wrote:
>> On 21.05.2010 15:45, Lorenz wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Until recently that was possible by unticking all drive type options
>>> and adding the respective paths to the include list.
>>> That is, a check mark in the drive typs section had the same result as
>>> adding all drive roots of the respective type to the include list.
>>>
>>> That doesn't seem to work any longer.
>>>
>>> To get what I want, I now additionally need to check 'Fixed drives'
>>> and 'Network drives' and add all drive roots to the exclude list.
>>
>> Yes, you now have to allow the drive type to make this work.
>
> Ok. That explains what I'm seeing, and I can get the desired behaviour
> back by adjusting my configuration.
>
> Is there a compulsory reason for this change?
>
> I found the old behaviour much more convenient - especially in cases
> where you want icon overlays only on a small number of directorys
> scattered over a small part of the local and remote drives present.

Maybe Stefan^2 knows more about the why.

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2613352
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].