[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: not "the usual" missing icon overlay question

From: Lorenz <lorenznl_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 06:43:44 +0000

Stefan Küng wrote:
>On 21.05.2010 15:45, Lorenz wrote:
>> [...]
>> Until recently that was possible by unticking all drive type options
>> and adding the respective paths to the include list.
>> That is, a check mark in the drive typs section had the same result as
>> adding all drive roots of the respective type to the include list.
>> That doesn't seem to work any longer.
>> To get what I want, I now additionally need to check 'Fixed drives'
>> and 'Network drives' and add all drive roots to the exclude list.
>Yes, you now have to allow the drive type to make this work.

Ok. That explains what I'm seeing, and I can get the desired behaviour
back by adjusting my configuration.

Is there a compulsory reason for this change?

I found the old behaviour much more convenient - especially in cases
where you want icon overlays only on a small number of directorys
scattered over a small part of the local and remote drives present.

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-05-25 10:39:55 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.