Stefan Küng wrote:
> Robert Roessler wrote:
> ...
>> Obviously a judgment call, and it is not my app, but clearly the
>> Apache-style semantic specification for specifying inclusion/exclusion
>> is more powerful (and complete) - but you are likely correct in
>> rejecting it because of the overkill factor. ;)
>
> Don't forget that the cache now only monitors *working copies*. Unlike
> before where it monitored the whole drives. Now, the monitoring is done
> on working copy roots (more monitoring points, but that shouldn't be a
> problem). Which reduces the need for such configuring of the
> include/exclude paths a lot.
Cool - I did not know that... so yes, the whole include/exclude bit is
not really all that exciting. ;)
>
> See here:
> http://nightlybuilds.tortoisesvn.net/latest/changelog.html#r11402
>
> Please try a nightly build after that fix. And maybe even wait for the
> next one (in case you're using it on Vista, that's strongly recommended).
All right, I will install a nightly from, say, tomorrow.
Thanks, Stefan.
Robert Roessler
robertr@rftp.com
http://www.rftp.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 22 20:58:17 2007