[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: TortoiseSVN book errata

From: Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-12-11 13:52:11 CET

2006/12/11, Lübbe Onken <l.onken@rac.de>:
> >
> > Maybe we use the official name is better ?
>
> I'm in favour of a consistent naming, but I think we often used the short
> "Subversion book" in a phrase to make it easier to read.
> I'd strip it down to two instead of four:
> 1) "Subversion book" when it's a link inside a phrase like: "Check for
> further information in Chapter 5 of the 'Subversion book'", which should be
> easy to read.
> 2) "Version control with Subversion" when we introduce the book and when we
> reference the book in its entirety.
>

agree
Received on Mon Dec 11 13:52:24 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.