[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: SVN Server or file protocal on network share?

From: Mike Newsome <Mike.Newsome_at_hitekp.com>
Date: 2006-08-22 10:56:06 CEST

Hello all


Are there any hidden drawbacks in using a network share as the
repository, for example increased network traffic or potential for
corruption by multiple commits?


I am looking into just this problem at the moment (my network admin is
wary of running an open source server on his network!)


Regards Mike Newsome



From: Sven Probst [mailto:sven.probst@ilt.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: 22 August 2006 09:22
To: users@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Subject: Re: SVN Server or file protocal on network share?



1. Full control of reading and writing access to all pathes in the
2. Repository can not be deleted accidentally.
3. Not every user can administrate the repository, only those
having file access.
4. The repository can be disconnected from the users shutting down
the server, e.g. for repository maintenance.


Clendon Gibson schrieb:

I am trying to find out what the advantages of useing a server for SVN
repository control are, as opposed to using Tortoise SVN clients on a
repositiory on a network file share. Our application would be multiple
Is there any reason to prefer one over the other?
Received on Tue Aug 22 10:56:04 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.