[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: RE: Re: SVN Server or file protocal on network share?

From: Scott Pritchett <scott.pritchett_at_amtrak.co.uk>
Date: 2006-08-22 11:07:23 CEST

Does that include Apache? I could understand svnserve.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Newsome [mailto:Mike.Newsome@hitekp.com]
Sent: 22 August 2006 09:56
To: users@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Subject: RE: Re: SVN Server or file protocal on network share?

Hello all


Are there any hidden drawbacks in using a network share as the repository, for example increased network traffic or potential for corruption by multiple commits?


I am looking into just this problem at the moment (my network admin is wary of running an open source server on his network!)


Regards Mike Newsome



From: Sven Probst [mailto:sven.probst@ilt.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: 22 August 2006 09:22
To: users@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Subject: Re: SVN Server or file protocal on network share?



1. Full control of reading and writing access to all pathes in the repository

2. Repository can not be deleted accidentally.

3. Not every user can administrate the repository, only those having file access.

4. The repository can be disconnected from the users shutting down the server, e.g. for repository maintenance.


Clendon Gibson schrieb:

I am trying to find out what the advantages of useing a server for SVN
repository control are, as opposed to using Tortoise SVN clients on a
repositiory on a network file share. Our application would be multiple user.
Is there any reason to prefer one over the other?
Received on Tue Aug 22 11:07:50 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.