[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: version numbering

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:40:27 +0200

On 16.04.2012 00:39, Simon Large wrote:
> On 15 April 2012 21:52, Daniel Becroft<djcbecroft_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Stefan Küng<tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Currently, the TSVN version is 1.7.6 while svn is at 1.7.4. So we're two
>>> micro versions apart.
>>> This apparently causes some problems on the svn mailing lists.
>>> It was suggested that svn therefore would skip two micro versions for
>>> their next release to catch up with TSVN, but that suggestion was
>>> rejected. Instead TSVN should instead change its version numbering to
>>> avoid confusion.
>>> The discussion on the svn dev list is here:
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/135106
>>> So instead of our next release being 1.7.7, it would be 1.7.6-2 and when
>>> svn 1.7.7 gets out, we would be at 1.7.6-3, and finally with svn 1.7.8
>>> we then would also be at 1.7.8.
>>> I'm not sure if this won't cause problems for us, since our users are
>>> used to only three digit numbers and might overlook the '-2' when
>>> reporting issues.
>>> So what do you think? Should we change our version numbering? Or just go
>>> on as we did before?
>> I'd leave everything as it is. I've read the thread on the svn-dev list, and
>> it seems that
>> this is being raised to solve user ignorance.
>> As long as the major versions match, I think that's best TSVN shouldn't need
>> to
>> adjust it's version numbering to match it's upstream suppliers, just as svn
>> doesn't
>> need to adjust it's version numbering to match downstream consumers.
> I tend to agree with Daniel here.
> But if we did change the numbering scheme, where would that version
> number appear? The Windows version reporting only supports 4 integer
> fields, so what happens to the subversion revision currently in the
> 4th field?
> And if we have the Windows version different from the version
> displayed in the About box then we have a different confusion. And the
> About box already shows the subversion version.

After careful consideration, I think we should not change our numbering
scheme at all and just keep doing what we do now.
The risk of breaking the installer/crash-reporter/whatever or confuse
our own users is just too high.


   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2012-04-16 19:40:36 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.