Hans-Emil Skogh wrote:
>>> I got some pretty strange results today when I tried to blame a file
>>> with "Include merge info" enabled.
>
> The latest nigtly looks much better!
>
> However vanilla blame (without merge info) is now broken. It only shows
> -1 on all revisions.
Ups - fixed in r16114.
>> Can you try the svn CLI to do the blame and compare?
> I tried the 1.6.0 CLI, and it worked similar to todays TSVN-nightly. It
> seems like the CLI confuses the first changed revision of some changes,
> but I do not know why. I have some lines that were changed in say rev
> 986 (several lines added), and merged in say 1078. But the CLI blame
> shows the blame for those lines as rev 1 with merge history enabled.
> Very strange. But I guess this is nothing that can be fixed on the
> TSVN-side of things...
>
> Over all the blame seems to work much better however (and in line with
> what I get from the CLI), but I would propose some changes:
>
> I would very much appreciate more details on the merged revisions in
> blame. Would it be possible to show when the change was merged and by
> who, for example in the popup-text for now?
Good idea.
>
> Could you also please provide more helpful headers in the generated
> blame file? I would propose "change rev" and "merge rev" instead of just
> "rev" and "rev".
Also good idea:
http://issues.tortoisesvn.net/index.php?do=details&task_id=434
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=1598013
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-08 17:23:33 CEST