Re: Strange merge behaviour with rc9
From: Kari Grano <kari.grano_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:08:09 +0300
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:01:23 +0200 Jens Seidel wrote:
> I'm CC:ed you even if you did not requested it as parts of your mail was
I'm using the haxx server to track the list. For some reason, I managed to
>> Specifically, it seems that the speed and outcome of
> -r A1:A2 is probably missing.
No - as I mentioned, the ranges are actually calculated by TSVN and reflect
>> I can somewhat understand the speed problem, but shouldn't the outcomes
>> relevant revisions on URL, ie. there is no reverse cherry picking or
> I would expect this as well. Nevertheless it isn't true for additions,
Thanks for the link. Very interesting thread. There may be good fundamental
svn merge -r2:4 URL
and
svn merge -r2:3 -r3:4 URL
Is this really by design?
>> Error: Error processing command 'append' in 'd:\va88\uit\libs'
> I haven't seen this up to now.
I managed to reproduce this with a test repo; see my response to Julian
Thanks,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.