On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Simon Large wrote:
> > I never really liked having user-editable content anyway. I would
> > rather see the correspondence on the mailing list and then put a
> > cleaned up version in the FAQ later. Personally I would disable all
> > comments in Drupal.
>
> Well, sometimes I'm an optimist: I always hope that someday someone will
> actually add a comment to the FAQ adding additional information :)
I'd say that having FAQ under version control is actually a good thing,
so I support the idea of moving FAQ source inside the repo.
> One thing to consider here: the /www directory gets checked out together
> with our sourcecode - some people might not like it if that directory
> gets too big :)
Yes, I am one of those people.
Besides unnecessary extra traffic, it is not a very clean solution.
How is Subversion Book hosted? Perhaps the same hosting would be good
for TSVN docs?
> But then again: compare that with the /www directory of the subclipse
> project, and we're fine :)
> >> As for the rest of the pages on tortoisesvn.net, we could easily move
> >> them back to tigris.org.
> >>
> >> If we just keep the issue tracker, the nightly builds and nightly docs
> >> on tortoisesvn.net, I think our server could handle that without much
> >> problems.
Another consideration is a site's user interface.
tortoisesvn.net has nice, clear and consistent interface
(except for issuetracker, but the latter is used very little compared
to other projects).
I think that tigris UI is far from ideal and moving parts of site to it
will make overall user experience worse.
Of course, nothing is worse than the dead server,
so if problems are really severe, by all means go for it.
--
Alexander S. Klenin
Insight Experts Ltd.
Received on 2008-03-19 10:43:05 CET