[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Merge tracking questions

From: Simon Large <simon.tortoisesvn_at_googlemail.com>
Date: 2007-09-03 22:42:46 CEST

On 03/09/07, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> wrote:
> Simon Large wrote:
>
> >> working copy: I made this the default in most dialogs. All it means is
> >> that the operation goes as deep as the working copy is. Usually, that's
> >> fully recursive. But if you checked out a working copy with a different
> >> depth (e.g. you only want the folder itself, not all subfolders too),
> >> then the operation itself will then use that depth. For update that will
> >> mean it won't fetch the 'missing' folders but only update what's already
> >> there. For merge, this means the merge won't pull in files/folders
> >> outside the already present files/folders.
> >
> > Shouldn't this option be available in update-to-revision as well?
>
> Unless you're using a build < 9038, it already is.

I'm using r10478 and that drop down has only 4 entries.

Simon

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Mon Sep 3 22:39:46 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.