Re: Question about SVN::ReceiveLog
From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-05-01 17:52:35 CEST
Stefan.Fuhrmann@etas.de wrote:
It's the edge-cases which makes our job worth doing. Otherwise anyone
> TSVN, however seems to use only a small sub-set
That's ok. I never really understood why someone would call log with
> * revisionStart >= revisionEnd
In case that's not true, just swap the two.
> * revisionStart may be HEAD, BASE or a specific
In case of WC as the start revision, substitute it with BASE.
> * revisionEnd is a specific revision number (or empty)
Seems ok.
> * pegRevision defaults to revisionStart if
If revisionStart has to be bigger than revisionEnd, then we can't force
I haven't really looked at your code on the branch, but shouldn't it be
> * pegRevision is a specific revision number (or empty)
I'd rather have the possibility to specify at least BASE/WC as the peg
> Are those restrictions o.k. within TSVN? In any case,
Yes, it shall stop. Otherwise it's hard to find the start of a branch.
Stefan
-- ___ oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile" (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.orgReceived on Tue May 1 17:52:45 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.