Lübbe Onken wrote:
> Any CMS/FAQ tool is much better
> suited for the FAQ than a static file could ever be. It's all about
> information retrieval and reorganization.
>
> Currently we don't have a single source FAQ. Most of it is in the
> Database and parts of it are in the doc sources. I'd prefer it if we
> could create the FAQ (even as a second document) from the database
> sources.
I thought we had agreed some time ago to delete the FAQ from the docs
and just point to the online version. We also talked about tools for
generating the doc xml source for the FAQ from the online FAQ, but that
seemed too difficult, and not really worth while, so we dropped it.
I have no particular objection to changing to a CMS just for the FAQ if
it is going to work better. Given that we want to maintain our loyalty
to tigris.org then maybe we should just leave the website as it is.
One website on tigris.org, so one set of links pointing to Berlios or
SourceForge or XXXX. If we change the FAQ/Issuetracker/LangPack site,
everyone knows where the main tigris.org site is so they can update
their links.
>> So just leave it there alone.
>> What the hell is the point in uploading the installers to sourceforge
>> too? Why? Why?
>
> Because you and I both don't like the installers distributed on
> several hosts. I want them on one host as well and due to the
> performance degradation we observed on berlios and the limited
> flexibility we have on tigris, I prefer sourceforge.
I think what Stefan is saying is that we need to decide on one host for
the installers, _then_ put them there, not copy them everywhere first
and choose later.
Simon
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 18 10:49:00 2005