[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[TSVN] Re: Re: Re: RFC: New cache scheme

From: Simon Large <slarge_at_blazepoint.co.uk>
Date: 2005-01-24 14:36:19 CET

SteveKing wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:57:47 -0000, Simon Large
> <slarge@blazepoint.co.uk> wrote:
>> Is one overlay enough for 'locked'? A file can be 'locked' and
>> 'modified' at the same time (assuming 'locked means 'locked by me').
>> Or do we just not display the lock status once a file has been
>> modified/deleted.
> "locked" means a file is not modifyable by you. You have to unlock it
> first. A locked file doesn't mean that someone else has the file
> locked, but most of the time simply means that you have to unlock it
> (and therefore prevent others from unlocking it) so you can modify it.
> So the 'locked' status would simply tell the user that (s)he can't
> modify that file.

OK. So it is similar to a read-only status and requires a request to the
server to get write permission. One overlay works well then.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 24 14:38:52 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.