[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] Re: Re: RFC: New cache scheme

From: SteveKing <stefankueng_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-01-24 13:45:14 CET

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:57:47 -0000, Simon Large <slarge@blazepoint.co.uk> wrote:

> Is one overlay enough for 'locked'? A file can be 'locked' and
> 'modified' at the same time (assuming 'locked means 'locked by me'). Or
> do we just not display the lock status once a file has been
> modified/deleted.

"locked" means a file is not modifyable by you. You have to unlock it
first. A locked file doesn't mean that someone else has the file
locked, but most of the time simply means that you have to unlock it
(and therefore prevent others from unlocking it) so you can modify it.
So the 'locked' status would simply tell the user that (s)he can't
modify that file.

Stefan

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 24 13:45:51 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.