[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[TSVN] Re: Severe performance degradation observed

From: Simon Large <slarge_at_blazepoint.co.uk>
Date: 2004-12-14 10:11:28 CET

Russell Hind wrote:
> Simon Large wrote:
>> Agreed, and maybe that's why it is easy to see the speed change in
>> this case. But later revisions are much slower than earlier
>> revisions, so something has changed. Of course it could be that
>> Russell applied one of the patches between these 2 revisions, but I
>> thought that happened earlier. I will check in the mail archives.
> I only applied patches when we first switched to the svn-1.1.1 branch.
> Since then I never applied any subsequently requested patches as we
> decided we didn't want to ship an overly customised build of svn.
> The svn codebase in my build hasn't changed since we switched to
> svn-1.1.1 (i.e. quite a while now)

Yes, according to the archives you were querying the patches on 29 Oct,
and revision 1920 (the last fast one I have) was built on 7 Nov. It's
not that then.


  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 14 10:20:07 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.