"Greg Irvine" <greg.irvine@thalesatm.com> wrote on 09/30/2006 11:18:04 PM:
> To follow up on a thread from August where Mark said that
bugtraq:logregex
> wasn?t implemented for various reasons including the fact no-one had
asked for it.
>
> So, Mark, now that I?m using these tracking features I?d love to have
the
> logregex working because I need to vary where my URL needs to go
depending
> on some keywords in the bug id, and logregex seems to be the only way I
can
> do that (by returning the BUGID as the full URL rather than as just the
#).
> Some change requests are bugs and some are evolutions and these two
things
> are stored in different ?databases?.
>
> So, if it?s not too much of hassle, it would be great to see it in an
up-
> coming release.
I do not understand regular expressions enough to even test the feature,
let alone implement it. One thing I would suggest if you have access to a
Windows box is to setup TortoiseSVN and test that you can get the feature
to work the way you want. My understanding of the feature is that it just
provide another way to extract bug ID's from the message. There is
nothing that allows you to provide alternate URL's.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 1 15:05:50 2006