[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] bugtraq:message and empty value

From: Mark Phippard <markp_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2006-10-01 15:00:57 CEST

"Greg Irvine" <greg.irvine@thalesatm.com> wrote on 10/01/2006 12:43:31 AM:

> A little more on this bugtraq:message value setting.
>
> If I set the value on the command line with:
> svn propset ?R bugtraq:message ?? .

Why are you setting it recursively? The property only needs to exist on
the top project folder.

> I end up with an empty value for the property, which is what I want.
> However, Subclipse seems to ignore this and shows no bug field in the
commit dialog.
> If I use the Subclipse property setting and enter ?? in the value field
> Subclipse correctly shows the bug field in the commit dialog.
> A quick test shows I have to use svn propset ?R bugtraq:message \?\? on
the
> command line to get a value in that Subclipse responds to.
>
> Is this expected or should Subclipse be responding to an empty value for

> bugtraq:message rather than requiring ?? ?

I wouldn't think that an empty value would work at all. It has to at
least contain %BUGID% + some kind of a prefix, otherwise we will not be
able to parse the bug from the message. So it should have a value like:

Issue: %BUGID%

or

#%BUGID%

Mark
 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 1 15:01:10 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.