Re: again: overwriting resource -> deleted and not modified
From: Mark Phippard <markp_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2005-11-26 16:02:32 CET
> If this feature hasn't been released yet, can I recommend that you scope
I do not see any point in scoping non svn: properties.
I would rather not use subclipse: in the property name.
I shouldn't use svn: in the name.
We use tsvn: in some names because of features that came from TortoiseSVN,
Ultimately it comes back to that I just do not see any point in adding
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.