I went into "manage configuration" and reverted sublipse to an older (pre-30,
28 for me) version, restarted, then updated (0.9.30 was listed on the update
site and 0.9.31 was not listed).
On Friday 10 June 2005 8:13 am, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Russel Winder <russel@russel.org.uk> wrote on 06/10/2005 11:03:54 AM:
> > On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 09:35 -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > > OK, I have added it back to our site.xml on the update site. Since it
> > >
> > > contains 0.9.30 and 0.9.31, I do not know if it will let you select
>
> the
>
> > > older version, but it is worth a shot.
> >
> > 0.9.30 doesn't appear on the list of offerings for Subclipse. 0.9.31 is
> > there. Am I perhaps seeing a cache? I don't have one locally, direct
> > Internet access but . . .
>
> Did you try using the update site before I did this? If so, then perhaps
> it is a cache, although I do not think so. I think Eclipse just
> automatically filters out the older versions.
>
> The problem is that since the dependency is outside of Eclipse we can't
> use any of the Eclipse-type features to let Eclipse know which version you
> can install.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>__ Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management
> Services powered by MessageLabs.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>__
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jun 11 01:12:36 2005