> Ouch. I looked here and found that my installation SAYS it is ALREADY
> using javahl and still is agonizingly slow. However I also ran find
> over my system looking for libsvnjavahl.so and it doesn't seem to exist.
>
> So I tried setting Eclipse to use the command-line adapter and it made
> no apparent difference. Does subeclipse fall back to the command-line
> adapter if you specify to use javahl and javahl is not available?
>
> I am willing to spend the time building javahl but not if I already have
> it. This still isn't completely clear.
What version of Subclipse are you using? There was a time when we did not
show any errors if it could not load JavaHL. Perhaps since 0.9.23 or so.
Yes, we will fallback to command line if JavaHL is not available. However,
you should see an error in preferences.
An exception ... have you installed JavaSVN at all? They replace JavaHL
and also provide an overridden svnClientAdapter that does not report an
error if JavaHL does not load.
If you cannot find the library, I would doubt you are using it. It must be
using the command line.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Received on Sun Feb 6 05:05:46 2005