[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: javahl - why would, or wouldn't I need it?

From: Steve Cohen <scohen_at_javactivity.org>
Date: 2005-02-05 18:32:21 CET

Mark Phippard wrote:
> Steve Cohen <stevecoh1@comcast.net> wrote on 02/03/2005 11:06:54 PM:

>>How would I know if it's included or not? (I am running svn based on
>>the RedHat 9.0 RPM packages here.
> Easiest way is to open Eclipse preferences to Team -> SVN and see if it
> allows you to select the JavaHL adapter.

Ouch. I looked here and found that my installation SAYS it is ALREADY
using javahl and still is agonizingly slow. However I also ran find
over my system looking for libsvnjavahl.so and it doesn't seem to exist.

So I tried setting Eclipse to use the command-line adapter and it made
no apparent difference. Does subeclipse fall back to the command-line
adapter if you specify to use javahl and javahl is not available?

I am willing to spend the time building javahl but not if I already have
it. This still isn't completely clear.

Received on Sun Feb 6 04:32:21 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.