Mark Phippard wrote:
>>Ouch. I looked here and found that my installation SAYS it is ALREADY
>>using javahl and still is agonizingly slow. However I also ran find
>>over my system looking for libsvnjavahl.so and it doesn't seem to exist.
>>
>>So I tried setting Eclipse to use the command-line adapter and it made
>>no apparent difference. Does subeclipse fall back to the command-line
>>adapter if you specify to use javahl and javahl is not available?
>>
>>I am willing to spend the time building javahl but not if I already have
>>it. This still isn't completely clear.
>
>
> What version of Subclipse are you using? There was a time when we did not
> show any errors if it could not load JavaHL. Perhaps since 0.9.23 or so.
> Yes, we will fallback to command line if JavaHL is not available. However,
> you should see an error in preferences.
>
> An exception ... have you installed JavaSVN at all? They replace JavaHL
> and also provide an overridden svnClientAdapter that does not report an
> error if JavaHL does not load.
>
> If you cannot find the library, I would doubt you are using it. It must be
> using the command line.
>
> Mark
>
>
I am using 0.9.26. I've never installed javaSVN. There is no error in
preferences.
Well, actually, this is odd. I thought I was running 0.9.26, I
installed it the other day, but the Eclipse - Manage Configuration still
shows me at 0.9.22.
And now I just installed 0.9.27. Same deal. Eclipse still says I'm on
0.9.22.
Received on Sun Feb 6 06:04:49 2005