We're having no problems (beyond the known subclipse issues) with the
win32 release out now for M7 (r503?) with SVN 1.0.1.
- Greg
Greg Irvine
Senior Software Engineer (HMI)
Thales ATM, Melbourne, Australia
E-mail: greg.irvine@thalesatm.com
Ph: (03) 9425 7544, Mobile: 0413 900 265
Address: 630 Church St, Richmond, VIC 3121
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this email, and any files transmitted with
it, is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain privileged
and/or confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance
on it. If you have received this email, and any files transmitted with
it, in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the
email from your system.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McClain Looney [mailto:m@loonsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2004 11:17 PM
> To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: Status of Subclipse
>
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2004, at 8:00 AM, Jonathan Shore wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> From: McClain Looney [mailto:m@loonsoft.com]
> >> the website is out of date, i believe latest windows builds are on
> >> 1.0,
> >> linux/osx is up to 1.0.1. I make 3.0 releases quite
> regularly, and
> >> try
> >> to track svn releases closely.
> >
> > Any chance we can get a 1.0.1 build for windows. Is it
> safe / viable
> > to use
> > a 1.0 against a 1.0.1 client/server?
>
> i don't believe anyone has compiled javahl from 1.0.1 for win32 (i
> don't run win32, otherwise i would).
>
> there is no danger i'm aware of in running 1.0.0 clients
> against 1.0.1
> servers.
>
> ---
> McClain Looney
> m@loonsoft.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Wed Apr 14 23:19:14 2004