Re: [Subclipse-dev] SVN Team Provider Proposal withdrawn

On 4/25/07, Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se> wrote:
> This comes as no big surprise and some of the reasons that are put
> forward on your web page applies to us too. Buckminster has a bundle
> that depends on the Subclipse core component. This might introduce IP
> concerns. If we kept only our core bundles within Eclipse and moved the
> ones with third-party dependencies out, some things would become a lot
> easier and I don't think we would loose a lot. One idea that came up was
> to ask you to accept our svn bundle as an optional feature in the
> Subclipse project. We would continue to maintain it of course but it
> would reside in your SVN. What's your reaction to that?

We do something similar for Mylar. I would not be against it.

You should also take a look at our svn-1.5 branch. I have changed the
packaging of the plug-ins so that everything is in plug-ins (no more
JAR within a JAR). JavaHL and SVNKit will be plug-ins as well that
contribute to an extension point.

Only JavaHL works at the moment though until SVNKit supports all the
new 1.5 features we use.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org