This comes as no big surprise and some of the reasons that are put
forward on your web page applies to us too. Buckminster has a bundle
that depends on the Subclipse core component. This might introduce IP
concerns. If we kept only our core bundles within Eclipse and moved the
ones with third-party dependencies out, some things would become a lot
easier and I don't think we would loose a lot. One idea that came up was
to ask you to accept our svn bundle as an optional feature in the
Subclipse project. We would continue to maintain it of course but it
would reside in your SVN. What's your reaction to that?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
Mark Phippard wrote:
> I just wanted to update people on these mailing lists to know that we
> have decided to withdraw our proposal to move Subclipse to
> Eclipse.org.
>
> I have put some of the reasons together in a web page here:
>
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/eclipse-proposal.html
>
> As the post states, Subclipse will continue on and we have some great
> things planned for this year. When I update the roadmap I will post
> it on the lists.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 25 08:21:26 2007