no objection
Mark Phippard wrote:
> I think we should change the license for svnClientAdapter back to
> Apache 2 license. I pushed to change it to EPL as part of our Eclipse
> proposal (now withdrawn) and that was probably a bad idea. I
> envisioned moving that code to Eclipse as part of our proposal, in
> which case it needed to be EPL. But really I should have just forked
> it if we did that and left the project here at Apache license for
> svnAnt and the other consumers.
>
> Anyone have any objections? All of the commits to that project since
> the license change were by me or Martin Letenay (except for one by Dan
> Rall). A couple of them were from patches from these people:
>
> Tomas Stupka (works on NetBeans so he will be OK with this)
> Manfred Klug
> Rainer Romataka
> Tammo Freese
>
> Subclipse license will stay EPL. Just talking about svnClientAdapter.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 24 23:35:57 2007