[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.9.12 test failure

From: Nathan Hartman <hartman.nathan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:06:41 -0400

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 6:03 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
wrote:

> Nathan Hartman wrote on Fri, 19 Jul 2019 17:32 +00:00:
> > I meant is there a script that generates the list of dependencies
> > actually used on the test system. E.g., as in this testing/signing
> > message from a prior release:
> >
> > https://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2019-04/0012.shtml
> >
> > Because even though I'm not signing, I'd like to report what was
> actually used.
>
> There's 'svn --version --verbose', and I think stsp's distro
> (tools/dev/unix-build/)
> has a target for this too, but beyond that, I don't think there's a single
> script
> you can use. Many developers use Debian derivatives, though; perhaps one
> of
> them will share a script you can use.
>
> People usually report what test combinations they ran. (That basically
> means what FS backend and RA layer you tested. If you set any relevant
> 'make'- or 'make check'-time knobs, it's useful to say that, too.)
>
> Also, I can't think of a reason why you shouldn't sign the tarballs.
>
> Thanks for testing,
>
> Daniel
>

Thanks. That does make it much easier to include the dependency info
for future tests.

I was under the impression that a signature is only meaningful when the
signer is a committer. :-)

Glad to help. Thanks to everyone for the latest Subversion releases!
Received on 2019-07-26 18:06:58 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.