Can anyone volunteer to review this important block-read fix?
(adding to CC: some people who might)
Philip Martin wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>> How do you feel about the amount of test coverage we are giving this
>> block-read code so far -- is it sufficient for a 1.10.0 release? And
>> should I roll RC2 ASAP or not?
> The block-read fix in STATUS still needs approval.
> As well as running the regression tests with block-read enabled I've
> also been putting some real repositories through block-read mode. I've
> used the original Collab Subversion repository: 40,000 revisions and
> about 0.5GB, the Subversion part of the ASF repository: 1.8M revisions
> and about 1.5GB, and the GCC repository: 250,000 revisions and about
> 9GB. I've done both dump/load and svnsync, with svnsync writing over
> http: and svn:. Writing over network protocols puts the FSFS cache in
> the server process and that allows me to access the same cache with read
> requests such as 'svnbench null-export' while the commits are being
> I've not had any further problems with these tests.
Received on 2018-03-23 16:10:48 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev