Julian Foad wrote:
> Can anyone volunteer to review this important block-read fix?
>
> (adding to CC: some people who might)
Thanks for your review, stefan2!
We now need one more review.
- Julian
> Philip Martin wrote:
>> Julian Foad writes:
>>> How do you feel about the amount of test coverage we are giving this
>>> block-read code so far -- is it sufficient for a 1.10.0 release? And
>>> should I roll RC2 ASAP or not?
>>
>> The block-read fix in STATUS still needs approval.
>>
>> As well as running the regression tests with block-read enabled I've
>> also been putting some real repositories through block-read mode. I've
>> used the original Collab Subversion repository: 40,000 revisions and
>> about 0.5GB, the Subversion part of the ASF repository: 1.8M revisions
>> and about 1.5GB, and the GCC repository: 250,000 revisions and about
>> 9GB. I've done both dump/load and svnsync, with svnsync writing over
>> http: and svn:. Writing over network protocols puts the FSFS cache in
>> the server process and that allows me to access the same cache with read
>> requests such as 'svnbench null-export' while the commits are being
>> made.
>>
>> I've not had any further problems with these tests.
>>
Received on 2018-03-26 10:00:42 CEST