[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:55:09 +0000

Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_apache.org> writes:

> How do you feel about the amount of test coverage we are giving this
> block-read code so far -- is it sufficient for a 1.10.0 release? And
> should I roll RC2 ASAP or not?

The block-read fix in STATUS still needs approval.

As well as running the regression tests with block-read enabled I've
also been putting some real repositories through block-read mode. I've
used the original Collab Subversion repository: 40,000 revisions and
about 0.5GB, the Subversion part of the ASF repository: 1.8M revisions
and about 1.5GB, and the GCC repository: 250,000 revisions and about
9GB. I've done both dump/load and svnsync, with svnsync writing over
http: and svn:. Writing over network protocols puts the FSFS cache in
the server process and that allows me to access the same cache with read
requests such as 'svnbench null-export' while the commits are being

I've not had any further problems with these tests.

Received on 2018-03-21 13:55:22 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.