[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: getting desperate because of assumed regression after 1.8.11

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:31:26 +0100

Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:

> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 01:54:03PM +0000, Lorenz wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm getting desperate because I think I've spotted a bug/regression in
>> svn since 1.8.11 and in spite of several post about the topic (both to
>> users and dev) noone seem interested in verifying or rejecting my
>> report.
>
> I can reproduce based on your script. Please file an issue.
> Thanks for your bug report, and for being so patient, and for not giving up :)

After a quick scan of the log for likely candidates the culprit appears
to be:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r1660023 | svn-role | 2015-02-16 04:01:29 +0000 (Mon, 16 Feb 2015) | 13 lines

Merge the 1.8.x-issue4411 branch:

 * r1513479, r1625522
   Fix issue #4411, 'parent-relative file external can corrupt working copy'.
   Justification:
     Broken working copies are bad.
   Notes:
     This also adds a test case for issue #4519 which was fixed in 1.8.11.
   Branch:
     ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-issue4411
   Votes:
     +1: stsp, rhuijben, stefan2

------------------------------------------------------------------------

With r1660022:

At revision 2.
                 2 2 pm wc
                 2 1 pm wc/e
    X 2 1 pm wc/em
                 2 2 pm wc/s
    X 2 1 pm wc/s/es

With r1660023:

At revision 2.
                 2 2 pm wc
                 2 1 pm wc/e
    X 2 ? ? wc/em
                 2 2 pm wc/s
    X 2 ? ? wc/s/es

-- 
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
Received on 2015-05-18 18:32:27 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.