Re: Time to branch 1.9
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:08:21 +0000
Branko Čibej wrote:
I've bumped most of them to 'unsheduled' and closed a couple. Two remain:
#4467 "blame youngest to oldest needs to handle SVN_INVALID_REVNUM"
Looks like some changes to the blame API since 1.8 are not correct.
#4506 "reintegrate into sparse working copy causes trouble"
I'm not sure if this is a regression. I'll take a look at it.
 In the past we have tended to bump their target milestone to the next minor release, but I think it's an invalid assumption that bugs not fixed in 1.9 should automatically be considered specifically for 1.10. Instead, issues should be assigned to 1.10 only when there is a specific reason to do so, such as being a regression from 1.9 which, by definition, these are not.
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.