Re: svn commit: r1614080 - in /subversion/branches/authzperf: BRANCH-README subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c subversion/libsvn_subr/config.c subversion/libsvn_subr/config_impl.h
From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:46:16 +0200
On 29.07.2014 12:25, Julian Foad wrote:
I don't care what prefix we use, but I do care that the rules that
We currently support two forms of patterns:
the distinguishing feature is that in both cases, the literal-fspath
because neither of these syntaxes are currently valid. We can invent a
If we decide that the config parser is fair game (since I'm already
>> where both "f*" and "*o" match "foo", we should always pick
I agree, intuitively, we'd want to pick the more concrete pattern (i.e.,
> 1. Do these rules match any other existing practice that we could compare with?
I'm not aware of any such existing practice, other than WANdisco's old
> 2. Are these rules documented in the authzperf branch yet?
Stefan^2 circulated a raw wiki page with the documentation, but I don't
> 3. Do these rules match the behaviour Stefan is currently implementing in the authzperf branch?
I haven't reviewed that part of his changes yet. :)
-- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco | Realising the impossibilities of Big Data e. brane_at_wandisco.comReceived on 2014-07-29 12:46:39 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.