[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1604421 - in /subversion/trunk: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/tests/cmdline/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_fs/ tools/server-side/svnfsfs/

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:34:08 +0200

On 26.06.2014 17:45, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:08:38PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> I'd be fine with switching to option 2 as long as everyone understands
>> the implications.
> How about we write option 3 code to generate option 1 code, then hardcode
> the generated option 1 code but put the option 3 code in a comment near
> the option 1 code as a reference?

I don't see how requiring people to review the generator /and/ the
generated constant, independently of each other, and prove that the
former produces the latter, will make the code more maintainable and

-- Brane

Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. brane_at_wandisco.com
Received on 2014-06-26 18:34:42 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.