[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Dependency versioning question

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 01:01:04 +0100

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Within serf, we're thinking about new models for connection and
> protocol handling. And bumping to 2.0 to make that happen. What is the
> effect upon libsvn_ra_serf and svn in general?
>
> My thinking is "no big deal". That upgrading to svn 1.9 (or 1.10 or
> whatever) would require installation of serf 2.0. All svn APIs would
> remain unchanged, per our own versioning guidelines (both source and
> binary APIs).

Provided that we haven't exposed any API details of serf in our
interface that's not a problem. I believe the only dependency where
we might run into such details would be APR since we do require the
use of APR APIs in order to use our library.
Received on 2013-06-06 02:01:44 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.