[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Dependency versioning question

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 15:11:02 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Reser [mailto:ben_at_reser.org]
> Sent: donderdag 6 juni 2013 02:01
> To: Greg Stein
> Cc: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Dependency versioning question
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Within serf, we're thinking about new models for connection and
> > protocol handling. And bumping to 2.0 to make that happen. What is the
> > effect upon libsvn_ra_serf and svn in general?
> >
> > My thinking is "no big deal". That upgrading to svn 1.9 (or 1.10 or
> > whatever) would require installation of serf 2.0. All svn APIs would
> > remain unchanged, per our own versioning guidelines (both source and
> > binary APIs).
>
> Provided that we haven't exposed any API details of serf in our
> interface that's not a problem. I believe the only dependency where
> we might run into such details would be APR since we do require the
> use of APR APIs in order to use our library.

+1

        Bert
Received on 2013-06-06 15:12:04 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.