Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

> > Nor should you even try to, IMO. There comes a time when it ceases to
> > make any sense to support an old compiler that's been EOL-d a while
ago,
> > especially since free versions of newer compilers are available.
> >
> > I would support removing the .dsp generator completely.
>
> +1, it's old and broke and better to not exist. If it's there someone
> is likely to try to use it.

Doesn't Apache officially only support vc6 builds for httpd on Windows?

I know some unofficial builds (and I use an x64 version compiled with
vs2008)
are available, but removing vc6 support would be premature if Apache isn't
widely available when built with newer compilers...

Kevin R.
Received on 2013-03-13 18:51:41 CET