Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Nor should you even try to, IMO. There comes a time when it ceases to
> make any sense to support an old compiler that's been EOL-d a while ago,
> especially since free versions of newer compilers are available.
>
> I would support removing the .dsp generator completely.

+1, it's old and broke and better to not exist. If it's there someone
is likely to try to use it.
Received on 2013-03-13 18:15:09 CET