Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'")
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 16:25:07 -0500:
> On 01/04/2013 03:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 19:31:20 +0100:
> >> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:23:28PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >>> Can anyone make an argument for me *not* to reintegrate my branch to trunk
> >>> for 1.8 release? I need to code up some more regression tests for the --cl
> >>> "" behaviors, but I don't really want to invest that energy today if I know
> >>> that dev@ is disinterested in seeing this new functionality in 1.8 anyway.
> >> Please merge it to trunk!
> >> This feature is already mentioned in the 1.8 draft release notes and
> >> I'm glad to learn that you've fixed it up.
> > I hope that's not the only reason you want to merge it --- it'd be
> > simple to axe it from the release notes.
> Yeah, I was kinda hoping for a bit more justification myself. Is the trunk
> behavior what we want to ship/live with? See, I'm having a bit of trouble
> really remembering the driving use-case here.
svn st -q --cl ""
Received on 2013-01-04 22:27:29 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev