On 01/04/2013 04:25 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 03:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 19:31:20 +0100:
>>> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:23:28PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>>> Can anyone make an argument for me *not* to reintegrate my branch to trunk
>>>> for 1.8 release? I need to code up some more regression tests for the --cl
>>>> "" behaviors, but I don't really want to invest that energy today if I know
>>>> that dev@ is disinterested in seeing this new functionality in 1.8 anyway.
>>>
>>> Please merge it to trunk!
>>>
>>> This feature is already mentioned in the 1.8 draft release notes and
>>> I'm glad to learn that you've fixed it up.
>>
>> I hope that's not the only reason you want to merge it --- it'd be
>> simple to axe it from the release notes.
>
> Yeah, I was kinda hoping for a bit more justification myself. Is the trunk
> behavior what we want to ship/live with? See, I'm having a bit of trouble
> really remembering the driving use-case here.
Oops! Sorry -- I meant "Is the *branch* behavior..." here.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
Received on 2013-01-04 22:26:51 CET