Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'")

On 01/04/2013 03:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 19:31:20 +0100:
>> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:23:28PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> Can anyone make an argument for me *not* to reintegrate my branch to trunk
>>> for 1.8 release? I need to code up some more regression tests for the --cl
>>> "" behaviors, but I don't really want to invest that energy today if I know
>>> that dev@ is disinterested in seeing this new functionality in 1.8 anyway.
>>
>> Please merge it to trunk!
>>
>> This feature is already mentioned in the 1.8 draft release notes and
>> I'm glad to learn that you've fixed it up.
>
> I hope that's not the only reason you want to merge it --- it'd be
> simple to axe it from the release notes.

Yeah, I was kinda hoping for a bit more justification myself. Is the trunk
behavior what we want to ship/live with? See, I'm having a bit of trouble
really remembering the driving use-case here.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development