Re: RFC: Build system changes

On 14.12.2012 4:21, Branko Čibej wrote:
> The only reason for trying for C++11 is, as far as I'm concerned,
> getting std::shared_ptr <memory>. The C++ bindings I'm slowly wrapping
> my head around will need it, and I don't want to even consider using
> standard containers without it. The only alternative to C++11 is using
> Boost, and that's a last resort grabbing for straws, as far as I'm
> concerned. -- Brane P.S.: Nothing wrong with Boost as such, of course;
> but including <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> tends to pull in some 90% of
> Boost's headers, and I consider that overkill.

If your only need is shared_ptr why not use std::tr1? A quick research
shows that it's bundled with all compilers.

Br, Miha
Received on 2012-12-14 07:39:18 CET