On 14.12.2012 07:38, Miha Vitorovic wrote:
> On 14.12.2012 4:21, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> The only reason for trying for C++11 is, as far as I'm concerned,
>> getting std::shared_ptr <memory>. The C++ bindings I'm slowly
>> wrapping my head around will need it, and I don't want to even
>> consider using standard containers without it. The only alternative
>> to C++11 is using Boost, and that's a last resort grabbing for
>> straws, as far as I'm concerned. -- Brane P.S.: Nothing wrong with
>> Boost as such, of course; but including <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> tends
>> to pull in some 90% of Boost's headers, and I consider that overkill.
> If your only need is shared_ptr why not use std::tr1? A quick research
> shows that it's bundled with all compilers.
Yes, I realised that and already changed the code that way. It's not
exactly bundled with /all/ compilers, but that's a detail I wont' worry
about right now.
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2012-12-14 07:48:03 CET