[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 21:17:30 +0300

Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:13:16 -0700:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > Philip Martin wrote on Wed, May 16, 2012 at 18:39:37 +0100:
> >> The issue that worries me the most is the traffic issue:
> >>
> >> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3980
> >
> > Your recent figures on that issue show a +122% increase in traffic.  Do
> > we know what the worst case increase is?  For example, does ra_serf
> > always require up to x% more traffic than ra_neon (for fixed x)?
>
> Looking at network traces from a current build, I don't think the
> PROPFIND issue Greg identified in the issue has been resolved
> yet...though I know there has been discussion on-list about it
> recently. A ~20% increase in traffic is quite likely due to that -

Perhaps I wasn't clear. The traffic using ra_serf is 2.2 times as much
as using ra_neon; see the (currently) last comment on the issue Philip
links to.
Received on 2012-05-16 20:18:07 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.