Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> Perhaps I wasn't clear.  The traffic using ra_serf is 2.2 times as much
> as using ra_neon; see the (currently) last comment on the issue Philip
> links to.

I definitely don't see that locally - I only see about a 20-25% gap -
which from looking at the traces appears to generally be due to the
extra PROPFIND requests.

Here's what I see for a checkout of svn trunk -
http(s)://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk

Neon (HTTP): 17294674 bytes
Neon (HTTPS): 17543641 bytes

Serf (HTTP): 21892977 bytes
Serf (HTTPS): 19399160 bytes

The reason HTTPS for ra_serf is smaller is that Serf and OpenSSL is a
pretty optimized path based on network packets... -- justin
Received on 2012-05-16 20:23:09 CEST