[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Ruby bindings failing on buildbots

From: Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 07:56:06 -0700

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Philip Martin
<philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com> writes:
>> Before r1293375, the node that represented 'diff1.txt' in this walk
>> had the "prop_mod" member set true. After r1293375, the "prop_mod"
>> member for this node is false. Since the implementation of
>> Svn::Info#get_diff_recurse checks "prop_mod" member before attempting
>> to collect the property changes on the node, the test started failing.
> I don't understand why prop_mod is no longer being set.

Because replay is no longer setting it?

>> My second patch removes the (optimization?) check for the "prop_mod"
>> member and thus always get the properties from the prior revision and
>> compares them with the current version. Making the test pass again for
>> me.
> That also looks dubious to me.
>> Is the prop_mod not being set in this scenario for this node the
>> desired behavior?
> In the past a property delete caused prop_mod to be set and now it does
> not.  The Subversion core is still reporting the property delete to the

So, from the first sentence here, it sounds like the change to not
report property deletions as "prop_mod" on the svn_repos_node_t is

> Ruby bindings layer at ChangedEditor.change_file_prop.  I don't

The Ruby bindings aren't using the ChangedEditor to track these
changes. Currently, the bindings rely on the state of the
svn_repos_node_t structs being passed out of the replay on the node
from the baton passed to the editor. (I think I said that right). The
state of the graph of nodes rooted in the one from the baton changed
after r1293375.

> understand the Ruby code so I don't know why prop_mod is no longer set
> but it seems like a bug to me.

Because replay is no longer setting it?
The bindings never *set* prop_mod on the svn_repos_node_t struct, they *use* it.

Perhaps the bindings should be re-implemented to use the Editor to
report these changes. But that doesn't change the question.

> --
> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
> http://www.uberSVN.com
Received on 2012-03-21 15:56:40 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.