[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] bump min serf version, or degrade? (was: svn commit: r1302682 ...)

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:07:33 -0400

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 13:43, Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com> wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 05:18 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Greg Stein<gstein_at_gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> With the change below, we can send all requests using Content-Length
>>> rather than chunking. This is the core work for fixing issue 3979.
>>>
>>> My question: should we simply bump the minimum serf to 1.1, or should
>>> we just omit the Content-Length functionality? If the latter, then
>>> users may run into 3979 if they have an older serf.
>>>
>>> I'm thinking: bump our requirement. It will require packagers/distros
>>> to get serf 1.1 packaged "soonish". (and no, it hasn't been released
>>> yet)
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Bump the required version: folks are going to have to repackage
>> Subversion as it is.  If you want a newer Subversion, you need to be
>> prepared for newer deps.
>
>
> Yes, if this is just for 1.8, then go to serf 1.1.

Way too much to backport to 1.7... so yeah, this is 1.8-only.

Thanks,
-g
Received on 2012-03-20 20:08:05 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.