[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] bump min serf version, or degrade? (was: svn commit: r1302682 ...)

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:43:15 -0700

On 03/19/2012 05:18 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Greg Stein<gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> With the change below, we can send all requests using Content-Length
>> rather than chunking. This is the core work for fixing issue 3979.
>> My question: should we simply bump the minimum serf to 1.1, or should
>> we just omit the Content-Length functionality? If the latter, then
>> users may run into 3979 if they have an older serf.
>> I'm thinking: bump our requirement. It will require packagers/distros
>> to get serf 1.1 packaged "soonish". (and no, it hasn't been released
>> yet)
>> Thoughts?
> Bump the required version: folks are going to have to repackage
> Subversion as it is. If you want a newer Subversion, you need to be
> prepared for newer deps.

Yes, if this is just for 1.8, then go to serf 1.1.

Received on 2012-03-20 18:43:49 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.